Sage
Online · AI Assistant · 24/7
A neutral framework for owners, controllers, asset managers and management companies comparing revenue recovery vendors, with the questions to ask and the red flags to watch for.
Choose hotel revenue recovery software by testing five things: which leak sources it covers, whether every finding ties back to a source record, whether the vendor actually recovers money or only reports it, how much work lands on your team, and how the vendor handles access to your systems and card data. Then compare pricing on the same basis and run a pilot on the same properties and the same period for every vendor you shortlist.
This guide gives controllers, owners, asset managers and management companies a neutral framework for that comparison, a checklist of questions to ask any vendor, and the red flags worth walking away from.
Hotel revenue recovery software compares the records that should agree with each other (reservations, folios, invoices, card settlements and payment remittances) and flags the gaps where money was billed wrongly, never collected or never paid. Most of the leakage at a typical property falls into six sources, covered in more depth in where hotels lose revenue:
Some products cover one of these sources in depth. Others cover several. Neither approach is wrong, but you should know which one you are buying and what it leaves uncovered.
Before you compare vendors, decide what kind of help you need. There are three common models.
Your accounting team exports OTA statements, virtual card reports and PMS data, then matches them by hand. This costs nothing in fees and keeps everything internal. The limits are capacity and consistency. Staff usually spot-check a sample, the work slips during month-end close, and results depend on who is doing it. It works for a single property with low OTA volume and a patient controller. It rarely holds up across a portfolio.
A tool matches the records and produces exception lists, and your staff investigate and file the disputes. You get automation and a consistent method, but your team still owns the follow-through. Ask how many hours a month the exceptions will take at your volume, and who covers the work when that person leaves. Our guide to automating hotel reconciliation covers what can and cannot be automated.
The vendor runs the matching and also works the recoveries: filing commission disputes, charging or flagging cards, building chargeback packets and following up on unpaid bills. Your team grants access and reviews results. This model costs more in fees or percentage, but it is the only one where the work gets done without adding headcount. Confirm exactly which steps the vendor performs and which still land on property staff.
Map each vendor against the six sources above. For each one, ask whether it is a core product with its own method or an add-on. Ask which channels, card programs and payment platforms are included, and whether coverage differs by brand or PMS. A vendor that covers two sources well may beat one that covers six thinly, but you need to see the gaps in writing.
Every finding should trace to the records that support it: the reservation, the folio, the invoice line, the card settlement. Ask to see a sample finding with its source documents attached. If a vendor reports a total without line-level detail your auditors can follow, you cannot verify it and you cannot defend it in a dispute.
Identifying a dollar is not the same as getting it back. Ask each vendor to report two numbers separately: dollars identified and dollars actually recovered, meaning credited, collected or paid into your account. The ratio between them tells you more than either number alone.
Ask for a written split of responsibilities by product. Who files OTA disputes? Who charges virtual cards? Who submits chargeback evidence and by what deadline? Who follows up on short-paid lodging bills? Anything left to property staff should be listed, with an estimate of weekly time.
Confirm the vendor supports your PMS, your OTA channels, your merchant accounts and any crew or corporate lodging platforms you use. Ask whether data comes through a direct connection, a login to each system, or files your team sends in. Files you have to send are work you have to remember. Also ask how the vendor handles a mixed portfolio running several PMS platforms.
A recovery vendor sees reservations, guest data and often payment information. Treat the review the way you would for any financial system. Our article on hotel cybersecurity for owners covers the broader picture. At minimum:
Owners and asset managers need a portfolio view. GMs need property detail. Controllers need exports that tie to the general ledger. Ask for a live demo of the dashboard showing roll-ups by property, product, channel and period, and ask whether access can be limited by role and property.
Most vendors price in one of three ways:
Whatever the model, ask for a worked example using your pilot results so every vendor is priced on the same basis.
Read the order form and the terms, not just the proposal. Check the initial term and renewal, the notice period to cancel, any setup or onboarding fees and whether they are refundable, fees that continue after termination on earlier findings, and how your data is returned or deleted at the end. Confirm that the access you are asked to grant in the contract matches what the sales team described.
Send the same questions to every vendor and ask for written answers.
Many vendors offer a free audit or pilot. Used well, it is the best evidence you will get. Set it up so the results are comparable:
This section describes x·quic, the publisher of this guide, against the criteria above, using what is stated on this site.
Hotel revenue recovery software compares reservations, folios, OTA invoices, card settlements and payment remittances to find money a hotel was owed but never received. Common sources include OTA commission overbilling, uncharged virtual cards, unpaid crew lodging bills, lost chargebacks, uncollected no-show fees and travel agent commissions. Some tools only report findings; others also work the recoveries.
Reconciliation software matches OTA invoices and virtual card payments against your PMS and produces a list of exceptions. Your team then investigates and files the disputes. A recovery service does the matching and also files disputes, follows up and tracks credits to completion. The right choice depends on how much staff time you have for exception work.
If the vendor stores, processes, transmits or can view card data, including OTA virtual card numbers, ask for its current PCI DSS Attestation of Compliance as a service provider. Also ask where card data appears in its platform and how access is controlled. If the vendor never touches card data, ask it to confirm that in writing.
Neither is better in every case. Percentage pricing means you pay only when money comes back, but costs rise as recoveries grow and the definition of savings matters. A subscription is predictable and you keep what is recovered. Model both against a full year of pilot results for your own properties before deciding.
Twelve months is a sound baseline. It captures seasonal patterns, expired virtual cards and chargeback cycles that a 30 or 90 day window can miss. Give every vendor the same properties and the same dates, and agree in advance how identified and recovered dollars will be defined, so the results can be compared fairly.
Start with a Free 1-Year Profit Audit. x·quic reconciles a full year of your records across all six leak sources and shows what was lost and what is recoverable, in your own numbers. No cost and no commitment.
We use cookies to understand how our site is used and to measure our marketing. You can decline and the site works exactly the same; nothing that isn’t essential will load. See our Privacy Policy.
